Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2019; 7(21): 3419-3435
Published online Nov 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i21.3419
Published online Nov 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i21.3419
Training set | Validation set | |||
Preoperative nomogram | Postoperative nomogram | Preoperative nomogram | Postoperative nomogram | |
Area under the curve | 0.811 | 0.799 | 0.821 | 0.774 |
Cutoff point | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Sensitivity, % | 0.736 | 0.706 | 0.768 | 0.855 |
Specificity, % | 0.753 | 0.764 | 0.744 | 0.598 |
Positive predictive value, % | 0.749 | 0.818 | 0.755 | 0.704 |
Negative predictive value, % | 0.741 | 0.634 | 0.828 | 0.787 |
Positive likelihood ratio | 2.98 | 2.99 | 3 | 2.127 |
Negative likelihood ratio | 0.351 | 0.385 | 0.304 | 0.242 |
- Citation: Chen QY, Hong ZL, Zhong Q, Liu ZY, Huang XB, Que SJ, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Nomograms for pre- and postoperative prediction of long-term survival among proximal gastric cancer patients: A large-scale, single-center retrospective study. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(21): 3419-3435
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i21/3419.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i21.3419