Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185
Table 4 Follow-up data in the robotic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy groups
| RRH(n = 216) | LRH (n = 342) | P value | |
| Average follow-up period (mo) | 30.07 ± 15.67 | 29.48 ± 15.07 | 0.658 |
| Median follow-up period (mo) | 29.0 (1.0-58.0) | 30.0 (3.0-58.0) | |
| Recurrence | |||
| Total recurrence rate | 15.7% | 12.00% | 0.206 |
| Number of patients with recurrence | 34 | 41 | |
| Median recurrence time (mo) | 20.0 (7.0-49.0) | 20.0 (3.0-48.0) | |
| Survival | |||
| Progression-free survival rate | 81.02% | 85.67% | 0.157 |
| Progression-free survival time | 28.91 ± 15.68 | 28.34 ± 15.13 | 0.669 |
| Overall survival rate | 92.13% | 94.45% | 0.292 |
| Overall survival time | 29.87 ± 15.92 | 29.41 ± 15.14 | 0.732 |
- Citation: Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i20/3185.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185