Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185
LRH (n = 342) | RRH (n = 216) | P value | |
Operative time (min) | 233.50 ± 59.76 | 197.16 ± 57.76 | 0.001 |
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 280.74 ± 246.66 | 163.09 ± 320.95 | 0.001 |
Intraoperative blood vessel and organ injuries (cases) | 3 (0.87%) | 5 (2.31%) | 0.153 |
Total number of dissected lymph nodes (pieces) | 25.09 ± 11.41 | 23.51 ± 9.31 | 0.748 |
Intraoperative blood transfusion (cases) | 39 (11.57%) | 8 (3.80%) | 0.001 |
Total length of hospital stay (d) | 17.19 ± 6.29 | 18.57 ± 5.61 | 0.777 |
Length of postoperative hospital stay (d) | 10.87 ± 4.44 | 12.28 ± 5.06 | 0.772 |
Postoperative chemotherapy (cases) | 172 (50.29%) | 102 (47.22%) | 0.268 |
Postoperative radiotherapy (cases) | 42 (12.28%) | 25 (11.57%) | 0.457 |
- Citation: Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i20/3185.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185