Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

Table 1 Baseline demographic data of patients in the robotic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy groups

	RRH (n = 216)	LRH (n = 342)	P value
Age (yr)	48.90 ± 9.65	47.49 ± 9.81	0.773
BMI (kg/m2)	24.20 ± 3.37	23.74 ± 2.96	0.925
FIGO stage
IA1-IB1	133 (61.57%)	208 (60.82%)
IB2-IIA1	67 (35.65%)	105 (30.70%)	0.902
IIA2-IIB	16 (2.78%)	29 (8.48%)
Pathological type
Squamous cell carcinoma	196 (90.74%)	316 (92.40%)
Adenocarcinoma	19 (8.80%)	22 (6.43%)	0.504
Adenosquamous carcinoma	1 (0.46%)	2 (0.58%)

RRH: Robotic radical hysterectomy; LRH: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; BMI: Body Mass Index; FIGO stage: International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage.