Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2019; 7(18): 2722-2733
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2722
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2722
TIA Group (n = 30) | Control Group (n = 204) | t/X2 Value | P-value | ||
Plaque location | Common carotid artery | 8 | 51 | 0.046 | 0.977 |
Carotid sinus | 18 | 124 | |||
Internal carotid artery | 4 | 29 | |||
Plaque property | Hard plaque | 9 | 104 | 6.062 | 0.048 |
Soft plaque | 14 | 54 | |||
Mixed plaque | 7 | 46 | |||
Lumen stenosis rate (%) | 58.26 ± 13.28 | 44.29 ± 21.82 | 3.411 | 0.001 | |
PSV (cm/s) | 90.34 ± 9.23 | 87.12 ± 9.42 | 1.753 | 0.081 | |
EDV (cm/s) | 17.24 ± 5.12 | 15.93 ± 3.82 | 1.673 | 0.096 | |
Proximal end WSS (dyne/cm2) | 9.15 ± 2.27 | 7.29 ± 3.86 | 6.720 | 0.000 | |
Distal end WSS (dyne/cm2) | 7.42 ± 1.95 | 6.39 ± 1.74 | 2.980 | 0.003 |
- Citation: Liu QY, Duan Q, Fu XH, Jiang M, Xia HW, Wan YL. Wall shear stress can improve prediction accuracy for transient ischemic attack. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(18): 2722-2733
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i18/2722.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2722