Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2019; 7(18): 2687-2703
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2687
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2687
Table 2 Type of endoscopic treatment applied to the study population
Endoscopic therapy | No. of patients | % out of entire batch |
Simple therapy | 174 | 11.01 |
Epinephrine injection | 62 | 3.92 |
Bipolar coagulation | 18 | 1.14 |
Hemoclip | 74 | 4.68 |
Banding1 | 7 | 0.44 |
Argon plasma coagulation | 13 | 0.83 |
Combined therapy | 375 | 23.72 |
Epinephrine injection + bipolar coagulation | 126 | 7.97 |
Epinephrine injection + hemoclip | 206 | 13.04 |
Epinephrine injection + bipolar coagulation + hemoclip | 35 | 2.21 |
Bipolar coagulation + hemoclip | 4 | 0.25 |
Epinephrine injection + argon plasma coagulation + hemoclip | 1 | 0.06 |
Epinephrine injection + banding | 2 | 0.15 |
Epinephrine injection + argon plasma coagulation | 1 | 0.06 |
- Citation: Lazăr DC, Ursoniu S, Goldiş A. Predictors of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper digestive bleeding. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(18): 2687-2703
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i18/2687.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2687