Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2019; 7(18): 2658-2665
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2658
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2658
Table 3 Neoplasia (type 2A) vs non neoplasia (type 1)
| First author | Sumimoto | Komeda | Our study |
| Accuracy, % | 99.0 | 98.0 | 88.8 |
| Sensitivity, % | 99.8 | 99.3 | 98.1 |
| Specificity, % | 87.5 | 85.7 | 53.3 |
| PPV, % | 99.1 | 98.5 | 88.9 |
| NPV, % | 97.5 | 92.3 | 87.9 |
- Citation: Hirata D, Kashida H, Iwatate M, Tochio T, Teramoto A, Sano Y, Kudo M. Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(18): 2658-2665
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i18/2658.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2658