Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2019; 7(10): 1122-1132
Published online May 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i10.1122
Table 2 Comparison of two dimensional shear wave elastography and textural features in different groups (Median, Range)
Comparison2D-SWEP-valueContrastP-valueCorrelationP-valueASMP-valueHomogeneityP value
F0 vs F1-4 ( ≥ F1)F05.97 (4.07-11.03)0.0011.51 (0.44-6.69)< 0.0010.97 (0.79-0.99)0.720.056 (0.015-0.87)0.0870.76 (0.64-0.97)0.002
F1-410.63 (6.40-44.87)8.39 (1.39-200.76)0.96 (0.67-0.990.043 (0.003-0.33)0.54 (0.33-0.87)
F0-1 vs F2-4 ( ≥ F2)F0-17.78 (4.07-17.43)< 0.0012.66 (0.44-19.64)< 0.0010.97 (0.79-0.99)0.0410.05 (0.015-0.87)0.110.69 (0.59-0.97)0.007
F2-411.94 (6.4-44.87)11.78 (1.39-200.76)0.94 (0.66-0.98)0.034 (0.003-0.33)0.61 (0.33-0.87)
F0-2 vs F3-4 ( ≥ F3)F0-29.03 (4.07-17.43)< 0.0013.39 (0.44-27.43)0.0020.96 (0.79-0.99)0.230.049 (0.012-0.87)0.110.68 (0.50-0.97)0.044
F3-414.97 (9.00-44.87)14.86 (1.39-200.76)0.94 (0.67-0.98)0.030 (0.003-0.33)0.59 (0.33-0.87)
F0-3 vs F4 (F4)F0-39.42 (4.07-22.23)0.0043.69 (0.44-67.49)< 0.0010.96 (0.74-0.99)0.290.05 (0.012-0.87)0.0180.68 (0.50-0.97)0.018
F417.30 (9.00-44.87)90.43 (9.34-200.76)0.93 (0.67-0.98)0.019 (0.003-0.094)0.50 (0.33-0.69)