Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2019; 7(1): 39-48
Published online Jan 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
Published online Jan 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
0.5-L Group (n = 47) | 1-L Group (n = 43) | Total (n = 90) | P value | |
Cecal intubation | 47 (100.0) | 42 (97.7) | 89 (98.9) | 0.964 |
Cecal intubation time (min) | 3.3 ± 1.7 | 3.6 ± 2.3 | 3.4 ± 2.0 | 0.507 |
Withdrawal time (min) | 8.3 ± 2.3 | 7.9 ± 2.5 | 8.1 ± 2.4 | 0.432 |
PDR | 17 (36.2) | 19 (44.2) | 36 (40.0) | 0.575 |
ADR | 13 (27.7) | 16 (37.2) | 29 (32.2) | 0.870 |
Advanced ADR | 3 (6.4) | 4 (9.3) | 7 (7.8) | 1.000 |
- Citation: Cho JH, Goo EJ, Kim KO, Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim TN. Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(1): 39-48
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i1/39.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39