Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2019; 7(1): 39-48
Published online Jan 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
Published online Jan 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
Table 4 Comparison of bowel preparation quality between study groups
0.5-L Group (n = 47) | 1-L Group (n = 43) | Total (n = 90) | P value | ||
ABPS | 0.617 | ||||
Excellent | 7 (14.9) | 7 (16.3) | 14 (15.6) | ||
Good | 31 (66.0) | 31 (72.1) | 62 (68.9) | ||
Fair | 9 (19.1) | 5 (11.6) | 14 (15.6) | ||
BBPS | |||||
Mean | 6.7 ± 1.5 | 7.0 ± 1.7 | 6.8 ± 1.6 | 0.342 | |
BBPS ≥ 8 | 13 (27.7) | 16 (37.2) | 29 (32.2) | 0.458 |
- Citation: Cho JH, Goo EJ, Kim KO, Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim TN. Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(1): 39-48
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i1/39.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39