Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2018; 6(3): 27-34
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Table 3 Surface staining on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31) and zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31) and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
| Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
| Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
| Surface staining | A | 31 (100) | 31 (100) | 29 (93.5) | 28 (90.3) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 26 (83.9) | 26 (83.9) |
| B | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.5) | 3 (9.7) | 4 (12.9) | 4 (12.9) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | |
| NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||||
- Citation: Ayna B, Ayna E, Çelenk S, Başaran EG, Yılmaz BD, Tacir İH, Tuncer MC. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(3): 27-34
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i3/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27