Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2018; 6(16): 1094-1100
Published online Dec 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1094
Published online Dec 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1094
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of non-overweight and overweight groups in both laparoscopy and open groups
LTG (n = 76) | OTG (n = 76) | ||||||
non-OW (n = 57) | OW (n = 19) | P -values | non-OW (n = 63) | OW (n = 13) | P-values | ||
Gender | Male | 42 | 13 | 0.66 | 52 | 10 | 0.45 |
Female | 15 | 6 | 11 | 3 | |||
Age (median, range) | 70 (40-83) | 64 (32-79) | 0.06 | 72 (17-80.6) | 71 (29-79) | 0.73 | |
BMI (median, range) | 21.2 (15.8-24.8) | 26.6 (25.2-30.4) | < 0.01 | 20.9 (13.6-24.9) | 27.6 (25.0-35.4) | < 0.01 | |
Extent of lymph node dissection | < D2 | 42 | 15 | 0.42 | 42 | 11 | 0.17 |
D2 ≤ | 15 | 4 | 21 | 2 | |||
Splenectomy | Yes | 11 | 3 | 0.73 | 17 | 2 | 0.31 |
No | 46 | 16 | 46 | 11 | |||
Tumor size (mm) (median, range) | 56 (6-185) | 50 (7-200) | 0.43 | 53 (14-211) | 75 (25-210) | 0.25 | |
Depth of tumor | M | 7 | 2 | 0.11 | 6 | 0 | 0.37 |
SM | 15 | 6 | 12 | 5 | |||
MP | 5 | 6 | 7 | 1 | |||
SS | 16 | 3 | 18 | 2 | |||
SE | 14 | 2 | 18 | 4 | |||
SI | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
Lymph node classification | N0 | 26 | 12 | 0.43 | 30 | 6 | 0.85 |
N1 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 1 | |||
N2 | 10 | 2 | 9 | 3 | |||
N3a | 8 | 1 | 11 | 1 | |||
N3b | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2 | |||
pStage | I | 25 | 10 | 0.34 | 26 | 6 | 0.51 |
II | 11 | 6 | 9 | 0 | |||
III | 17 | 2 | 22 | 5 | |||
IV | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
- Citation: Nakagawa M, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, Kobayashi K, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K. Feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in overweight patients: Implications of less impact of overweight on laparoscopic versus open approach. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(16): 1094-1100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i16/1094.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1094