Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2018; 6(16): 1094-1100
Published online Dec 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1094
Published online Dec 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1094
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients
All patients | Matched patients | ||||||
LTG (n = 110) | OTG (n = 211) | P -values | LTG (n = 76) | OTG (n = 76) | P-values | ||
Gender | Male | 81 | 162 | 0.53 | 55 | 62 | 0.18 |
Female | 29 | 78 | 21 | 14 | |||
Age (median, range) | 70 (32-83) | 69 (17-86) | 0.92 | 70 (32-83) | 71 (17-86) | 0.53 | |
BMI (kg/m2) (median, range) | 23.2 (15.8-31.0) | 22.2 (13.6-38.3) | 0.07 | 21.9 (15.8-30.4) | 27.4 (13.6-35.4) | 0.35 | |
period | Early | 39 | 148 | < 0.01 | 39 | 28 | 0.07 |
Late | 71 | 63 | 37 | 48 | |||
Extent of lymph node dissection | D2 < | 91 | 120 | < 0.01 | 57 | 53 | 0.47 |
D2 | 22 | 142 | 19 | 23 | |||
Splenectomy | Yes | 14 | 99 | < 0.01 | 14 | 19 | 0.33 |
No | 96 | 112 | 62 | 57 | |||
Tumor size (mm) (median, range) | 45 (6-200) | 70 (13-230) | < 0.01 | 52 (6-200) | 59 (14-213) | 0.14 | |
pT | M | 21 | 7 | < 0.01 | 9 | 6 | 0.49 |
SM | 34 | 23 | 21 | 17 | |||
MP | 19 | 15 | 11 | 8 | |||
SS | 20 | 71 | 19 | 20 | |||
SE | 16 | 89 | 16 | 22 | |||
SI | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | |||
pN | N0 | 65 | 63 | < 0.01 | 38 | 36 | 0.38 |
N1 | 19 | 30 | 13 | 7 | |||
N2 | 13 | 40 | 12 | 12 | |||
N3a | 9 | 48 | 9 | 12 | |||
N3b | 4 | 30 | 4 | 9 | |||
pStage | I | 66 | 37 | < 0.01 | 35 | 32 | 0.20 |
II | 20 | 51 | 17 | 9 | |||
III | 19 | 93 | 19 | 27 | |||
IV | 5 | 30 | 5 | 8 |
- Citation: Nakagawa M, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, Kobayashi K, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K. Feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in overweight patients: Implications of less impact of overweight on laparoscopic versus open approach. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(16): 1094-1100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i16/1094.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1094