Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2018; 6(15): 931-935
Published online Dec 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.931
Published online Dec 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.931
Variable | RIRS group | Mini-PCNL group | P value |
Operative time (min) | 56.48 ± 24.77 | 60.04 ± 30.38 | 0.345 |
Stone-free rate (postoperative 1 d) (%) | 102/113 (90.2) | 96/103 (93.2) | 0.822 |
Stone-free rate (postoperative 2 mo) (%) | 106/113 (93.8) | 98/103 (95.1) | 0.986 |
Hospital stay (d) | 9.39 ± 4.01 | 14.08 ± 5.26 | < 0.0001 |
No. of Clavien complications | 0.643 | ||
Grade 0 | 89 | 76 | |
Grade I | 18 | 19 | |
Grade II | 6 | 7 | |
Grade III | 0 | 1 | |
Grade IV/V | 0 | 0 | |
Preoperative Hb (g/dL) | 137.12 ± 15.57 | 140.15 ± 16.04 | 0.161 |
Postoperative Hb (g/dL) | 128.05 ± 16.87 | 125.34 ± 16.68 | 0.237 |
Hospitalization costs ($) | 2624.5 ± 513.36 | 3255.2 ± 976.5 | < 0.0001 |
- Citation: Li MM, Yang HM, Liu XM, Qi HG, Weng GB. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat lower pole renal stones 1.5-2.5 cm in diameter. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(15): 931-935
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i15/931.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.931