Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2018; 6(14): 759-766
Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.759
Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.759
Outcomes | Results |
Time spent for operation (min), mean ± standard deviation | 205.6 ± 66.7 |
No. of patients undergoing Lap-Re-Do (yes/no) | 3/5 |
Concomitant incisional hernia (yes/no) | 2/6 |
Types of mesh (biologic/Sepramesh) | 2/6 |
Intraoperative complication (yes/no) | 1/7 |
Size of mesh (cm2), median (range) | 300 (221.3-300) |
Pain score on postoperative day 1 (VAS) | |
Median (range) | 1 (1-2) |
VAS = 1 | 6 patients |
VAS = 2 | 2 patients |
Number of days of postoperative stay, mean ± standard deviation | 10.4 ± 6.3 |
Follow-up period (mo), mean (min, max) | 12.9 (6, 22) |
Number of hernia recurrences | 0 |
Postoperative complication (yes/no) | 2/6 |
- Citation: Huang DY, Pan L, Chen QL, Cai XY, Fang J. Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia with a three-point anchoring technique. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(14): 759-766
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i14/759.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.759