Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2018; 6(14): 753-758
Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753
Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753
Group C (n = 31) | Group D (n = 14) | P-value | |||
mean ± SD | n (%) | mean ± SD | n (%) | ||
Age (yr) | 66.53 ± 12.47 | 65.79 ± 14.18 | 0.8601 | ||
Gender (male) | 25 (80.6) | 12 (85.7) | 0.5182 | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 25.65 ± 3.70 | 23.14 ± 3.64 | 0.0511 | ||
EE | 6 (19.4) | 8 (57.1) | 0.0112 | ||
Hiatus hernia | 17 (54.8) | 6 (42.9) | 0.4572 | ||
LSBE | 9 (29.0) | 2 (14.3) | 0.2872 | ||
Biopsy pieces | 5.69 ± 2.82 | 4.00 ± 2.18 | 0.0391 |
- Citation: Lee SW, Lien HC, Chang CS, Lin MX, Chang CH, Ko CW. Benefits of the Seattle biopsy protocol in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in a Chinese population. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(14): 753-758
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i14/753.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753