Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2018; 6(14): 753-758
Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753
Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753
Table 1 General data and endoscopic appearances of groups A and B
Group A (n = 20) | Group B (n = 78) | P-value | |||
mean ± SD | n (%) | mean ± SD | n (%) | ||
Age (yr) | 60.95 ± 17.29 | 55.19 ± 13.28 | 0.1891 | ||
Gender (male) | 9 (45.0) | 35 (44.9) | 0.9922 | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 25.76 ± 4.52 | 23.69 ± 3.59 | 0.0791 | ||
EE | 7 (35.0) | 15 (19.2) | 0.1322 | ||
Hiatus hernia | 8 (40.0) | 15 (19.2) | 0.0512 | ||
LSBE | 2 (10.0) | 3 (3.8) | 0.2692 | ||
Biopsy pieces | 4.58 ± 1.57 | 3.39 ± 1.74 | 0.0091 |
- Citation: Lee SW, Lien HC, Chang CS, Lin MX, Chang CH, Ko CW. Benefits of the Seattle biopsy protocol in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in a Chinese population. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(14): 753-758
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i14/753.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753