Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2018; 6(13): 624-631
Published online Nov 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.624
Published online Nov 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.624
Size of Lesion | Recommendations |
1-5 mm | Too small to characterize, considered benign |
No further imaging follow-up recommended | |
6-9 mm | Consider single follow-up in 2-3 yr, preferably MRCP/MRI pancreas |
If stable at follow up, no further imaging follow-up recommended | |
1-1.9 cm | Consider follow-up MRCP/MRI or CT pancreas in 1-2 yr |
If stable at follow-up, lengthen interval imaging follow-up to 2-3 yr | |
2-2.9 cm | Consider baseline EUS, then follow-up MRCP/MRI or CT pancreas in 6-12 mo |
Consider surgery in young, fit patients with need for prolonged surveillance | |
If stable at follow-up, lengthen interval imaging follow-up to 1-2 yr | |
≥ 3 cm | Consider baseline or follow-up EUS, then follow-up MRCP/MRI or CT pancreas in 3-6 mo |
Strongly consider surgery in young, fit patients |
- Citation: Nguyen AK, Girgis A, Tekeste T, Chang K, Adeyemo M, Eskandari A, Alonso E, Yaramada P, Chaya C, Ko A, Burke E, Roggow I, Butler R, Kawatkar A, Lim BS. Effect of a region-wide incorporation of an algorithm based on the 2012 international consensus guideline on the practice pattern for the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms in an integrated health system. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(13): 624-631
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i13/624.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.624