Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2018; 6(12): 501-513
Published online Oct 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i12.501
Published online Oct 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i12.501
First author, year, country | Study type | CD population, disease location, behavior, surgery | Duration of CD in yr | MD | Aim of study | Methods used to assess CD activity, timing | Follow-up time |
Eder, 2016, Czech Republic[42] | RS | 26 adults, responsive to induction doses of anti-TNF, median age (IQR) 27 yr (IQR: 21-36), 61% F, L3, B1 62%, B2 7%, B3 31% | Median (IQR): 4 (2-6) | Study MD: IFX or ADA, 1 yr Concomitant MD: CS 88%, AZA 88%, 5ASA 100%, AB 54% | Predictive role of MH, TH and IH healing on long-term CR | Clinical, endoscopic, and MRE activity: before starting anti-TNF and after induction (week 12-14 for ADA and week 9-12 for IFX) | Median 29 mo (IQR: 14-46) after finishing 1 yr of anti-TNF |
Sauer, 2016, United States[43] | RS | 101 children, 41.6% F, L1 28%, L2 24%, L3 54.5%, L4a 17.8%, L4b 24.7%, B1 76%, B2 18%, B3 2%, B2B3 4%, perianal 14% | Median (range): 4.7 (1.65-11.5) | IMD 33%, Biologic 67% | Predictive role of MRE remission on long-term CR, MD change and surgery | MRE, at median of 1.3 yr from diagnosis | Median 2.8 yr after MRE |
Deepak, 2016, United States[14] | RS | 150 adults, 66% treatment-naïve, median age (IQR) at diagnosis 23 yr (IQR: 19-33), 50% F, L1 48.7%, L3 40.7%, L4 10.6%, B1 45%, B2 35.3%, B3 19.3%, perianal 19.3%, prior CD-related surgery 61.3% | Median (IQR): 9 (3-21) | At second CTE/MRE: Anti-TNF alone: 20%, THIO alone 36%, MTX alone 5.3%, Anti-TNF + THIO 24%, Anti-TNF + MTX 5.3%, Budesonide 8%, Natalizumab 1.4% | Predictive role of radiologic response on long-term outcomes: CS use, hospitalization, and surgery | Serial CTE/MRE: first and follow-up (705 CTE/MREs): pre-therapy and after 6 mo or 2 CTE/MREs ≥ 6 mo apart (during maintenance therapy) | Median 4.6 yr (IQR: 1.6-7) |
Fernandes, 2017, Spain[13] | RS | 214 adults, 49.5% F, median age (IQR) 36.8 (16–77) yr, L1 76.6%, L3 23.4%, L4 10.3%, B1 44.4%, B2 26.2%, B3 29.4%, perianal 29.9%, prior intestinal resection 40.7% | Median (IQR): 7.4 (0-40.8) | THIO 54.7%, MTX 0.5%, Anti-TNF 18.7% | Predictive roles of MH and TH for hospital admission, surgery and MD escalation (start an IMD or biologic, escalate anti-TNF or switch to a different biologic) | MRE and IC performed within a 6-mo interval (median: 2.3 mo) | Median (IQR): 3.5 (1-7.9) yr Evaluation after 12 mo |
Ripollés, 2016, Spain[41] | PS multicenter | 51 adults, active disease, 47% F, median age (IQR) 35 yr (27-46), L1 57%, L2 21.5%, L3 21.5%, B1 57%, B2 10%, B3 33%, perianal 27.5%, history of surgery 33% | Median (IQR): 5 (2-10.3) | Active MD: Anti -TNF (IFX or ADA) 100% (63% combined with IMD) | Predictive role of TH on clinical outcome, change in MD, surgery | Clinical and US / CEUS at baseline, 12 wk and 1 yr after treatment | Median (IQR): 16 mo (12.2-32) |
Orlando, 2018, Italy[44] | PS | 30 adults, 33.3% F, mean age (± SD) 38.8 (± 14.5) yr, L1 40%, L3 60%, B1 53.3%, B2 40%, B3 6.7%, prior intestinal resection 40% | Mean ± SD: 9.8 ± 7.7 | Active MD: Anti-TNF (IFX 53.3%, ADA 46.7%) Concomitant MD: 5ASA 10%, CS 10%, THIO 16.7% | Predictive role of TH and intestinal fibrosis on clinical outcome (hospitalization and surgery) | US and UEI at baseline, 14 and 52 wk after therapy | Median (range): 20 mo (10-38) |
Laterza, 2018, Italy[15] | PS | 57 adults, mean age (± SD) 45.3 (± 17) yr, 42.2% F, L1 38.6%, L2 8.7%, L3 52.6%, B1 31.6%, B2 54.4%, B3 14%, perianal 7%, previous surgery 22.8% | Mean ± SD: 7.4 ± 1 | No therapy 10.5%, CS 26.3%, Anti-TNF 10.5%, CS + IMD 15.8%, CS + anti-TNF 8.8%, IMD + anti-TNF 8.8%, CS + IMD + anti-TNF 19.2% | Predictive role of a single and/or combined (CR, MH and TH) remission on outcomes (surgery, hospitalizations, MD changes - introduction of IMD or anti-TNF, anti-TNF escalation, switch to another anti-TNF, need for CS and deaths) | Clinical, endoscopic and CTE at baseline | Up to 36 mo |
- Citation: Serban ED. Treat-to-target in Crohn’s disease: Will transmural healing become a therapeutic endpoint? World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(12): 501-513
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i12/501.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i12.501