Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2018; 6(11): 418-425
Published online Oct 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i11.418
Published online Oct 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i11.418
Study | Phase | Treatment | Number of patients | Patient population | RR | mPFS | mOS |
Rubinson[39] | I/II | Cetuximab + pertuzumab | 7 | Chemo- and cetuximab-refractory | 14% | 2.1 mo | 3.7 mo |
Sartore-Bianchi (HERACLES)[40] | II | Trastuzumab + lapatinib | 27 | Chemo- and cetuximab/panitumumab-refractory | 30% | 21 wk | 46 wk |
Hainsworth (MyPathway)[44] | II | Trastuzumab + pertuzumab | 34 | Chemo-refractory | 35% | NR | NR |
Siena (HERACLES-RESCUE)[42] | II | Trastuzumab-emtansine | Recruiting | Chemo- and cetuximab/panitumumab and trastuzumab plus lapatinib-refractory | |||
NCT03457896 | II | Neratinib + trastuzumab or cetuximab | Recruiting | Cetuximab and/or chemo-refractory | |||
MOUNTAINEER[45] | II | Tucatinib + trastuzumab | Recruiting | Chemo- and bevacizumab-refractory |
- Citation: Kanat O, Ertas H, Caner B. Dual HER2 inhibition strategies in the management of treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: History and status. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(11): 418-425
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i11/418.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i11.418