Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections

Table 4 Details of clinical outcomes between cautery and non-cautery dilator in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections

Study	Year	Country	Design	Center	Stent style	No.	PFC style	Overall Technical success	Overall Clinical success	Overall bleeding rate	Dilated approaches (A. balloon/tapered dilator; B. needle knife; C. cystotome catheter; D. ERCP cannula)	Cautery dilator
Lang et al[38]	2018	United States	RS	Single	LAMS/DDPS	103	PPC/WON	99%	95%	5%	A + B	YES
Siddiqui et al[46]	2017	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS/ DDPS/ FCSEMS	313	WON	99%	90%	3%	A + B	YES
Bapaye et al[13]	2017	India	RS	Single	BFMS/MPS	133	WON	100%	82%	5%	A + C	YES
Lakhtakia et al[54]	2016	India	RS	Single	FCSEMS	205	WON	99%	75%	3%	A + C	YES
Siddiqui et al[31]	2016	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	82	PPC/WON	86% PPC 100% WON	100% PPC 88% WON	7%	A + B	YES
Ang et al[20]	2016	Singapore	RS	Multi	FCSEMS/ DPPS	49	PPC/WON	100%	96%	4%	A + B + C	YES
Vazquez-Sequeiros et al[39]	2016	Spanish	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	211	PPC/WON	97%	94%	7%	A + B + C	YES
Sharaiha et al[7]	2016	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	124	WON	100%	86%	3%	A + B + C	YES
Sharaiha et al[47]	2015	United States	RS	Multi	ECSEMS/ DDPS	230	PPC	96%	90%	4%	A + B	YES
Gornals et al[11]	2015	Spain	RS	Single	LAMS	12	WON	100%	100%	17%	A + C	YES
Mukai et al[14]	2015	Japan	RS	Single	FC BFMS/Plastic	70	WON	100%	96%	4%	A + C	YES
Lee et al[55]	2014	South Korea	PS	Single	FCSEMS/ DDPS	50	PFC	100%	10%	2%	A + B	YES
Puri et al[48]	2012	India	PS	Single	DPPS	40	PPC	100%	98%	3%	A + B	YES
Itoi et al[12]	2012	Japan	RS	Single	LAMS	15	PPC	100%	100%	20%	A + C	YES
Bang et al[50]	2017	United States	RCT	Single	LAMS/DDPS	21	WON	NR	NR	14%	A	NO
Rinninella et al[44]	2015	Italy	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	93	PFC	99%	93%	1%	A	NO
Yamamoto et al[56]	2013	Japan	RS	Single	FCSEMS	9	PPC/WON	100%	78%	11%	A	NO
Bang et al[63]	2013	United States	RS	Multi	MTGT	53	WON	NR	70%	1%	A	NO
Varadarajulu et al[27]	2011	United States	RS	Single	DDPS	211	PPC/WON	NR	85%	1%	A + D	NO
Varadarajulu et al[65]	2011	United States	PS	Single	DDPS	110	PPC/WON	100%	92%	1%	A + D	NO
Talreja et al[53]	2008	United States	PS	Single	FCSEMS	18	PFC	95%	78%	13%	A	NO

PPC: Pancreatic pseudocyst; WON: Walled-off necrosis; PFC: Pancreatic fluid collections; PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; Single: Single-center; Multi: Multi-center; FCSEMS: Fully covered self-expandable metal stent; LAMS: Lumen-apposing metal stents; DDPS: Double-pigtail plastic stents; BFMS: Fully covered bi-flanged metal stents; MPS: Multiple plastic stents; MTGT: Multiple transluminal gateway technique; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; NR: Not reported.