Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections

Table 2 Details of the adverse events associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections

Study	Year	Country	Design	Single/multi-center	Stent style	No.	PFC style	Infection	Bleeding	Perforation	Migration	Occlusion	Other adverse events
Lang et al[38]	2018	United States	RS	Single	LAMS/DPPS	103	80 PP 23 WON	0%	5%	1%	0%	0%	13% Unplanned endoscopy
Aburajab et al[10]	2018	United States	RS	Single	LAMS with DPPS/with no DPPS	46	PP	9%	0%	2%	15%	0%	9% Re-intervention
Siddiqui et al[46]	2017	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS/ DPPS/ FCSEMS	313	WON	3%	3%	2%	1%	8%	12% (No details)
Bapaye et al[13]	2017	India	RS	Single	BFMS / MPS	133	WON	2%	5%	0%	2%	0%	14% Persistent sepsis
Bang et al[50]	2017	United States	RCT	Single	LAMS/ DPPS	21	WON	0%	14%	0%	0%	0%	2% Buried stent 5% Biliary stricture
Bang et al[6]	2017	United States	RS	Single	LAMS/ DPPS	60	21 PP 39 WON	12%	0%	0%	5%	0%	28% Re-intervention
Lakhtakia et al[54]	2016	India	RS	Single	FCSEMS	205	WON	0%	3%	1%	1%	10%	1% Buried stent
Sharaiha et al[7]	2016	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	124	WON	6%	3%	0%	6%	6%	19% Re-intervention
Gornals et al[11]	2016	Spain	RS	Single	LAMS	12	WON	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	None
Siddiqui et al[31]	2016	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	82	14 PPC 68 WON	6%	7%	0%	0%	5%	2% Stent maldeployment; 1% pneumoperitoneum
Ang et al[20]	2016	Singapore	RS	Multi	FCSEMS / DPPS	49	WON 14 PP 35	2%	4%	2%	0%	0%	2% Pneumoperitoneum
Vazquez-Sequeiroset et al[39]	2016	Spain	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	211	112 PP 99 WON	23%	7%	-	5%	0%	3% Perforation/pneumoperitoneum
Shah et al[41]	2015	United States	PS	Multi	LAMS	33	PPC/WON	6%	0%	0%	3%	0%	None
Walter et al[45]	2015	The Netherlands	PS	Multi	LAMS	61	PPC/WON	7%	0%	2%	0%	0%	None
Sharaiha et al[47]	2015	United States	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	112	PPC	14%	4%	3%	1%	7%	None
Rinninella et al[44]	2015	Italy	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	93	WON 52 PPC18 PA 19 APFC 4	1%	1%	1%	1%	0%	1% Pneumoperitoneum
Mukai et al[14]	2015	Japan	RS	Single	FC BFMS / DPPS	70	WON	0%	4%	1%	4%	0%	1% Mediastinal emphysema
Lee et al[55]	2014	South Korea	PS	Single	FCSEMS/ DPPS	50	PFC	0%	2%	0%	4%	0%	None
Yamamoto et al[56]	2013	Japan	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	9	5 PPC 4 WON	0%	11%	0%	11%	0%	None
Bang et al[63]	2013	United States	RS	Multi	MTGT	76	WON	8%	1%	1%	4%	0%	None
Puri et al[48]	2012	India	PS	Single	DPPS	40	40 PPC	3%	3%	0%	0%	0%	3% Pneumoperitonium
Itoi et al[12]	2012	Japan	RS	Single	LAMS	15	9 PPC 6 WON	0%	20%	0%	7%	0%	None
Varadarajulu et al[27] (Endo Trans Dra of pfc)	2011	United States	RS	Single	DPPS	211	154 PPC 57 WON	3%	1%	1%	1%	0%	None

PPC: Pancreatic pseudocyst; WON: Walled-off necrosis; PFC: Pancreatic fluid collections; PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; Single: Single-center; Multi: Multi-center; FCSEMS: Fully covered self-expandable metal stent; LAMS: Lumen-apposing metal stents; DDPS: Double-pigtail plastic stents; BFMS: Fully covered bi-flanged metal stents; MPS: Multiple plastic stents; MTGT: Multiple transluminal gateway technique; NR: Not reported.