Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections

Table 1 Detailed outcome measures for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections

Study	Year	Country	Design	Single/multi-center	Stent style	No.	PFC style	Technical success	Clinical success	Adverse events	Mortality	Cause of death	Follow-up period
Lang et al[38]	2018	United States	RS	Single	LAMS	19	PPC/WON	99%	94%	53%	5%	Due to bleeding from splenic artery pseudoaneurysms	≥ 6 mo
					DPPS	84	PPC/WON	99%	96%	11%	0%
Aburajab et al[10]	2018	United States	RS	Single	LAMS with no DPPS	46	PPC	96%	91%	25%	0%	None	2-4 mo
					LAMS with DPPS	23	PPC	100%	100%	0%	0%
Siddiqui et al[46]	2017	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	86	WON	97.70%	90%	12%	0%	None	≥ 6 mo
					DPPS	106	WON	99%	81%	15%	0%
					FCSEMS	121	WON	100%	95%	2%	0%
Bapaye et al[13]	2017	India	RS	Single	BFMS	72	WON	100%	94%	6%	4%	Died from sepsis; organ failure; pulmonary embolism	2 mo
					MPS	61	WON	100%	74%	36%	7%
Bang et al[50]	2017	United States	RCT	Single	LAMS	12	WON	NR	NR	50%	0%	None	4-6 wk
					DPPS	9	WON	NR	NR	0%	0%
Bang et al[6]	2017	United States	RS	Single	LAMS	20	PPC/WON	100%	95%	10%	5%	Died of progressive sepsis	1-2 yr
					DPPS	40	PPC/WON	100%	93%	13%	0%
Lakhtakia et al[54]	2016	India	RS	Single	FCSEMS	205	WON	99.00%	75%	4%	0%	None	12 mo
Sharaiha et al[7]	2016	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	124	WON	100%	86%	19%	0%	None	3 mo
Gornals et al[11]	2016	Spain	RS	Single	LAMS	12	WON	100%	100%	33%	0%	None	13 ± 11.4 mo
Siddiqui et al[31]	2016	United States	RS	Multi	LAMS	82	PPC/WON	86% PPC 100% WON	100% PPC 88% WON	10%	0%	None	6 mo
Ang et al[20]	2016	Singapore	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	12	PPC/WON	100%	92%	NR	NR	NR	NR
					DPPS	37	PPC/WON	100%	65%	5%	NR
Vazquez-Sequeiros et al[39]	2016	Spanish	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	211	PPC/WON	97%	94%	21%	NR	NR	≥ 6 mo
Shah et al[41]	2015	United States	PS	Single	LAMS	33	PPC/WON	91%	93%	12%	NR	NR	11 mo
Walter et al[45]	2015	The Netherlands	PS	Single	LAMS	61	PPC/WON	98%	93%PPC 81%WON	9%	1%	Died from an unrelated cause (myocardial infarction	4 mo
Sharaiha et al[47]	2015	United States	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	112	PPC	98%	98%	16%	0%	None	≥ 1 yr
					DPPS	118	PPC	92%	89%	31%	0%
Rinninella et al[44]	2015	Italy	RS	Multi	FCSEMS	69	PPC/WON	99%	93%	5%	4%	Died because of multi-organ failure and massive bleeding	10 mo
Mukai et al[14]	2015	Japan	RS	Single	FC BFMS	43	WON	100%	98%	7%	7%	Because of bleeding	1-2 yr
					DPPS	27	WON	100%	93%	19%	0%
Lee et al[55]	2014	South Korea	PS	Single	FCSEMS	25	PFC	100%	87%	0%	0%	None	6-7 mo
					DPPS	25	PFC	100%	91%	8%	0%
Yamamoto et al[56]	2013	Japan	RS	Single	FCSEMS	9	PPC/WON	100%	78%	22%	10%	Because of multiple organ failure	2 mo
Bang et al[63]	2013	United States	RS	Multi	MTGT	76	WON	NR	70%	15%	15%	Due to portal hypertension	1-2 yr
Puri et al[48]	2012	India	PS	Single	DPPS	40	PPC	100%	98%	8%	0%	None	48 mo
Itoi et al[12]	2012	Japan	RS	Single	LAMS	15	PPC	100%	100%	0%	0%	None	11 mo
Varadarajulu et al[27]	2011	United States	RS	Single	DPPS	211	PPC/WON	NR	85%	8%	1%	Due to delayed bleeding	1-2 yr
Varadarajulu et al[64]	2011	United States	RS	Single	MTGT	12	WON	100%	92%	0%	0%	None	5 mo

PPC: Pancreatic pseudocyst; WON: Walled-off necrosis; PFC: Pancreatic fluid collections; PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; Single: Single-center; Multi: Multi-center; FCSEMS: Fully covered self-expandable metal stent; LAMS: Lumen-apposing metal stents; DDPS: Double-pigtail plastic stents; BFMS: Fully covered bi-flanged metal stents; MPS: Multiple plastic stents; MTGT: Multiple transluminal gateway technique; NR: Not reported.