Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2016; 4(8): 213-218
Published online Aug 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i8.213
Published online Aug 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i8.213
Table 3 Complications and other events
| Loop-type guidewire (Group A) | Straight-type guidewire (Group B) | P-value | |
| Bleeding | 0 | 0 | - |
| Perforation | 0 | 0 | - |
| Pancreatitis | 0 | 1 | NS |
| Pre-ERCP amylase level | 72.84 ± 20.63 | 72.75 ± 20.40 | NS |
| (41-112) | (43-120) | ||
| Post-ERCP amylase level | 257.15 ± 136.44 | 552.05 ± 534.57 | < 0.05 |
| (88-628) | (101-2389) | ||
| Frequency of unintended insertion of the guidewire into a side branch of the pancreatic duct | 0.056 ± 0.23 | 2.3 ± 1.84 | < 0.05 |
| (0-1) | (0-5) | ||
| Hyperamylasemia | 2 | 9 | < 0.05 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | - |
- Citation: Sakai Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Sugiyama H, Hayashi M, Senoo JI, Sasaki R, Kusakabe Y, Nakamura M, Yasui S, Mikata R, Miyazaki M, Yokosuka O. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by pancreatic duct stenting using a loop-tipped guidewire. World J Clin Cases 2016; 4(8): 213-218
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v4/i8/213.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v4.i8.213