Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2016; 4(10): 310-317
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.310
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.310
Table 2 Kampo formulas and response rates
Kampo formulas | Major response | Minor response | No response | Total (%) |
GJG-related formulas | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 (25.0) |
GJG alone | 3 (D; 1, E; 2) | 1 (D) | 0 | 4 |
Combination with | ||||
+ Hangebyakujutsutemmato (E) | 0 | 1 (E) | 0 | 1 |
+ Nijutsuto (E) | 0 | 1 (E) | 0 | 1 |
HJG-related formulas | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 (12.5) |
HJG alone | 1 (E) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Combination with | ||||
+ KBG (E) | 0 | 1 (E) | 0 | 1 |
+ Juzentaihoto (D) | 0 | 0 | 1 (E) | 1 |
Others | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 (16.7) |
Keishikaryojutsubuto (E) | 1 (E) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
+ Bukuryoingohangekobokuto (E) | ||||
Uzukeishito (D) | 0 | 1 (E) | 0 | 1 |
Shimbuto (E) | 0 | 1 (E) | 0 | 1 |
Juzentaihoto-ka-bushi (E) | 0 | 0 | 1 (E) | 1 |
Total (aconite root-containing formulas) | 5 | 6 | 2 | 13 (54.2) |
KBG (D) + Nichinto (D) | 1 (D) | 1 (D) | 0 | 2 |
Tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto (D, E) | 0 | 1 (D) | 1 (E) | 2 |
Keihito (D) | 1 (D) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Boiogito (D) + Tokishakuyakusan (E) | 1 (D + E) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Ryokyojutsukanto (E) + Unkeito (E) | 0 | 1 (E) | 0 | 1 |
Ryokyojutsukanto (E) | 0 | 0 | 1 (E) | 1 |
Total (warming formulas without aconite roots) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 (33.3) |
Seinetsuhokito (D) | 1 (D) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Hochuekkito (D) | 0 | 1 (D) | 0 | 1 |
Goreisan (D) | 0 | 1 (D) | 0 | 1 |
Total (formulas without warming effects nor aconite roots) | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 (12.5) |
Total (all formulas) (%) | 9 (37.5) | 11 (45.8) | 4 (16.7) | 24 (100.0) |
- Citation: Kimata Y, Ogawa K, Okamoto H, Chino A, Namiki T. Efficacy of Japanese traditional (Kampo) medicine for treating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A retrospective case series study. World J Clin Cases 2016; 4(10): 310-317
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v4/i10/310.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.310