Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2015; 3(9): 823-830
Published online Sep 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i9.823
Table 2 Laparoscopic mesh repair treatment for sports hernias
Ref.TreatmentResultsRecurrence
Diaco et al[42]Preperitoneal approach (n = 96)Return to active participation within 3-6 wk in 92/96 patients-
Edelman et al[43]Preperitoneal approach (n = 10)Return to full activity within 4 wk in 9/10 patientsNone
Ingoldby[44]Laparoscopic vs conventional (n = 14 each)Laparoscopic treatment superior: return to training in 4 wk (13/14 vs 9/14), resume full contact (3 wk vs 5 wk; P < 0.05)Conventional: hernia, n = 1 after 22 mo; laparoscopic: pain, n = 1 after 5 mo
Susmallian et al[10]Preperitoneal approach (n = 35)Return to full activity in 34/35 patients-
Srinivasan et al[45]Extraperitoneal approach (n = 15)Return to full activity within 4 wk in 13/15 patientsNone
Genitsaris et al[46]Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (n = 131)100% of patients returned to full activity within 2-3 wkPain, n = 4; hernia, n = 1 after 7 yr
Paajanen et al[47]Extraperitoneal approach vs conventional treatment (n = 30 each)Laparoscopic treatment superior: return to full activity within 3 mo (27/30 vs 8/30)-
Paajanen et al[48]Extraperitoneal approach (n = 41)Return to full activity within 4 wk in 39/41 patients-
van Veen et al[49]Extraperitoneal approach (n = 55)100% of patients returned to full activity within 3 mo-
Kluin et al[4]Preperitoneal approach (n = 17)Return to full activity within 3 mo in 13/17 patientsMinor symptoms, n = 2 after 1 yr
Ziprin et al[50]Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (n = 17)Return to full activity in 16/17 patients within a median of 42 dMild pain, n = 5