Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 16, 2015; 3(4): 360-367
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i4.360
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i4.360
Group A (n = 14) | Group B (n = 14) | |||||||
Mean | Median | Mean | Median | Assumed calculated interval (increased of 0% to 50% of median in group B) | Estimated difference median by Hodges-Lehmann estimator | 95%CI | ||
TOF ratio 0.9 | 118.8 | 129 | 96.6 | 105 | 0 to 52.5 | 24 | 0 to 45 | Differences not assumed |
TOF ratio 0.8 | 96.7 | 101 | 80.1 | 82.5 | 0 to 43.7 | 18 | -5 to 39 | Assumed |
TOF ratio 0.7 | 78.4 | 90 | 66.3 | 65 | 0 to 32.5 | 10 | -10 to 35 | Assumed |
- Citation: Mesa DS, Fayad MF, Arviza LP, Ruiz VDV, Carreño FC, Tamargo LA, Díaz MA, Montes SFP. Efficacy of different doses of sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(4): 360-367
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v3/i4/360.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i4.360