Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2015; 3(2): 156-162
Published online Feb 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.156
Table 1 Changes in the composition of the microbiota of the treated group when compared to the placebo group
Design of the studySubjectsAgeProbioticsResults in intervention vs placeboRef.
Double blinded controlled trialn = 33 placebo group;83 ± 7 yrOat drink fermented with Bifidobacter um longum and B. longumB.catenulatumLahtinen et al[28]
B. bifidum
n = 33 control group84 ± 8 yrB. breve
Double blinded controlled trialn = 20 placebo;> 60 yrReconstituted skim milk containing Bifidobacterium lactisBifidobatteriAhmed et al[29]
n = 20 low dose of probiotics;Lactobacilli
n = 20 medium dose of probiotics;Enterococci
n = 20 high dose of probioticsEnterobatteri
Double blinded controlled trialn = 9 placeboMean 71 yrBifidobacterium bifidum and B. lactisBifidobacteriaBartosch et al[4]
Mean 73 yrtogether withLactobacilli
n = 9 symbionts (mixture of probiotics and prebiotics)inulinB. bifidum