Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2015; 3(2): 156-162
Published online Feb 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.156
Published online Feb 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.156
Design of the study | Subjects | Age | Probiotics | Results in intervention vs placebo | Ref. |
Double blinded controlled trial | n = 33 placebo group; | 83 ± 7 yr | Oat drink fermented with Bifidobacter um longum and B. longum | ↑B.catenulatum | Lahtinen et al[28] |
↑B. bifidum | |||||
n = 33 control group | 84 ± 8 yr | ↑B. breve | |||
Double blinded controlled trial | n = 20 placebo; | > 60 yr | Reconstituted skim milk containing Bifidobacterium lactis | ↑Bifidobatteri | Ahmed et al[29] |
n = 20 low dose of probiotics; | ↑Lactobacilli | ||||
n = 20 medium dose of probiotics; | ↑Enterococci | ||||
n = 20 high dose of probiotics | ↓Enterobatteri | ||||
Double blinded controlled trial | n = 9 placebo | Mean 71 yr | Bifidobacterium bifidum and B. lactis | ↑Bifidobacteria | Bartosch et al[4] |
Mean 73 yr | together with | ↑Lactobacilli | |||
n = 9 symbionts (mixture of probiotics and prebiotics) | inulin | ↓B. bifidum |
- Citation: Rondanelli M, Giacosa A, Faliva MA, Perna S, Allieri F, Castellazzi AM. Review on microbiota and effectiveness of probiotics use in older. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(2): 156-162
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v3/i2/156.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.156