Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants

Table 1 Cumulative success rates of short implants placed in posterior region

Ref.	Implant surface	Implant length	N implants	Period of evaluation	Success rate (%)
Bahat[127]	Machined-surface	7 mm	-	5 to 70 mo	90.50
Winkler et al[130]	Machined-surface	< 10 mm	181	3 yr	93.40
Friberg et al[103]	Machined-surface	< 10 mm	247	8 yr	93.70
Deporter et al[84]	Porous-surface	7 or 9 mm	48	8.2 to 50.3 mo	100.00
Tawil et al[107]	Machined-surface	≤ 10 mm	269	12 to 92 mo	95.50
Griffin et al[113]	Hydroxyapatite-coated	8 mm	168	Up to 68 mo	100.00
Renouard et al[151]	Machined or oxidized surface	6 to 8.5 mm	96	2 yr	94.60
Goené et al[110]	Acid-etched surface	7 or 8.5 mm	311	3 yr	95.80
Misch et al[85]	Roughened surface	7 or 9 mm	745	6 yr	98.90
Anitua et al[86]	Micro-rough acid-etched surface; bioactive surface	7 to 8.5 mm	532	5 yr	99.20
Grant et al[117]	-	8 mm	335	up to 2 yr	99.00
Anitua et al[114]	-	< 8.5 mm	1.287	1 to 8 yr	99.30
De Santis et al[97]	Oxidized surface	< 8.5 mm	107	1 to 3 yr	98.10
Maló et al[104]	Oxidized surface	7 mm	217	12 mo	95.00
Pieri et al[111]	-	6 mm	61	2 yr	96.80
Perelli et al[27]	Porous-surface	5 or 7 mm	110	5 yr	90.00
Jiansheng et al[109]	Hydroxyapatite-coated and ankylos	5.7 to 8 mm	162	2 yr	99.40
Slotte et al[29]	Acid-etched surface	4 mm	100	2 yr	92.30
Deporter et al[88]	Porous-surface	7 or 9 mm	48	10 yr	95.50