Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 2, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6551)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

568

WORD

299

HTML

3920

Figures (1-2)

197

Sum=4984

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

853

Download

714

Sum=1567

Sep 16, 2014 (publication date) through Jul 18, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (17)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Editorial

World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2014; 2(9): 402-408
Published online Sep 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Dislocation of the L3-L4 interspinous posterior device in a patient with double level implant. The patient underwent revision surgery with removal of both interspinous posterior devices followed by decompression and stabilization with screws and rods.

Citation: Landi A. Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication? World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(9): 402-408
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i9/402.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402