Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2014; 2(11): 698-704
Published online Nov 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.698
Published online Nov 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.698
Simultaneous(n = 10) | Staged(n = 12 ) | P-value | |
Age (yr), median (IQR) | 68 (60-71) | 63 (62-67) | 0.41 |
Stone size (mm), mean ± SD | 8.0 ± 3.8 | 9.9 ± 5.3) | 0.31 |
Location | |||
Renal | 2 (20) | 2 (17) | 0.82 |
Proximal | 2 (20) | 2 (17) | 0.82 |
Multiple | 1 (10) | 4 (33) | 0.22 |
Distal | 5 (50) | 4 (33) | 0.42 |
Procedure (n = 29) | 11 | 18 | |
Open | 2 (18) | 0 (0) | - |
Rigid URS | 5 (46) | 5 (28) | - |
Flexible URS | 2 (18) | 4 (22) | - |
SWL | 2 (18) | 4 (22) | - |
PCNL | 0 (0) | 5(28) | - |
RARP | 1 (10) | 2 (17) | - |
RRP | 9 (90) | 10 (83) | - |
Patient symptomatic | 7 (70) | 10 (83) | 0.53 |
History of stones | 9 (90) | 7 (58) | 0.13 |
-
Citation: Viers BR, Tollefson MK, Patterson DE, Gettman MT, Krambeck AE. Simultaneous
vs staged treatment of urolithiasis in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(11): 698-704 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i11/698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.698