Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2014; 2(11): 689-697
Published online Nov 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.689
Table 2 Treatment of periampullary perforations (Stapfer’s type II perforations)
Ref.Patients (n)Patients according to treatment method, n (%)Treatment methodMortality n (%)
Alfieri et al[15]156 (40.0)Conservative management + ENBD ± PTBD0 (0.0)
9 (60.0)Surgery1 (11.1)
Wu et al[16]116 (54.5)Conservative management0 (0.0)
5 (45.5)Surgery4 (80.0)
Kim et al[58]52 (40.0)Conservative management0 (0.0)
3 (60.0)Surgery0 (0.0)
Enns et al[12]1311 (84.6)Conservative management ± biliary drainage (PTBD, ERBD)0 (0.0)
2 (13.4)Surgery0 (0.0)
Polydorou et al[23]3024 (80.0)Conservative management ± biliary drainage (PTBD, ERBD)0 (0.0)
6 (20.0)Surgery0 (0.0)
Stapfer et al[18]63 (50.0)Conservative management0 (0.0)
3 (50.0)Surgery0 (0.0)
Howard et al[17]2218 (81.8)Conservative management ± biliary drainage (ENBD, ERBD)0 (0.0)
4 (18.2)Surgery1 (25)
Morgan et al[22]1212 (100.0)Conservative management0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)Surgery0 (0.0)
Kim et al[59]98 (88.8)Conservative management ± ENBD0 (0.0)
1 (11.2)Surgery0 (0.0)