Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2025; 13(7): 95004
Published online Mar 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.95004
Published online Mar 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.95004
Ref. | Average age (range) (years) | Male (%) | Meniscus tear type | Meniscus tear location | Laterality of tear |
Eggli et al[11], 1995 | 29 (13-58) | 85.2 | X | X | Medial: 43, lateral: 9 |
Lucas et al[13], 2015 | 14 (9-18) | 52.9 | Longitudinal: 7, horizontal cleavage: 3, radial: 2, complex: 3, bucket handle: 4 | Posterior: 12, middle: 6, anterior: 2 | Medial: 10, lateral: 9 |
Hupperich et al[14], 2018 | 31.1 (14-58) | 63.2 | Bucket handle: 38 | X | Medial: 24, lateral: 14 |
Hagmeijer et al[12], 2019 | 16.1 (9.9-18.7) | 90.6 | Bucket handle: 17, simple (longitudinal, horizontal cleavage, radial): 11, complex: 5 | X | Medial: 17, lateral: 16 |
Moon et al[15], 2020 | 54.9 | 20.6 | Medial meniscus root tear: 63 | X | Medial: 63 |
- Citation: Javid K, Akins X, Lemaster NG, Ahmad A, Stone AV. Impact of time between meniscal injury and isolated meniscus repair on post-operative outcomes: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(7): 95004
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i7/95004.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.95004