Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2025; 13(7): 95004
Published online Mar 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.95004
Table 1 The methodological index for non-randomized studies
Quality assessment criteria
Eggli et al[11], 1995
Lucas et al[13], 2015
Hupperich et al[14], 2018
Hagmeijer et al[12], 2019
Moon et al[15], 2020
Clearly stated aim22222
Inclusion of consecutive patients12122
Prospective collection of data00202
Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study22222
Unbiased assessment of study endpoint00002
Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study22222
Loss to follow up less than 5%22202
Prospective calculation of study size00002
Adequate control group00000
Contemporary groups00000
Baseline equivalence of groups00000
Adequate statistical analysis11112
Total score101112918