Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2025; 13(5): 101306
Published online Feb 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i5.101306
Table 3 Comparison of artificial intelligence/machine learning models and traditional screening methods for diabetic retinopathy
Screening method
Accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
Key points
CNNsHighHighHighCapable of analysing complex retinal images with high accuracy and scalability
Support vector machinesModerateModerateModerateEffective in classifying pre-extracted features but less scalable than CNNs
Random forestsModerateModerateModerateGood for feature extraction-based classification; robust but less flexible
Traditional manual fundus examinationVariableLow to moderateLow to moderateDependent on the skill of the ophthalmologist; less accessible and scalable