Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2025; 13(14): 102534
Published online May 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534
Published online May 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534
Table 3 Comparative analysis of complications between the experimental and control groups, n (%)
| Group | Cases | Pulmonary infection | Electrolyte disturbance | Renal function damage | Stress ulcer |
| EG | 80 | 18 (22.5) | 6 (7.5) | 2 (2.5) | 15 (18.8) |
| CG | 80 | 20 (25) | 30 (37.5) | 20 (25) | 16 (20) |
| χ2 value | 0.138 | 20.645 | 17.075 | 0.040 | |
| P value | 0.710 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.841 |
- Citation: Gao WW, Jiang XB, Chen P, Zhang L, Yang L, Yuan ZH, Wei Y, Li XQ, Tang XL, Wang FL, Wu H, Zhao HK. Role of disturbance coefficient in monitoring and treatment of cerebral edema in patients with cerebral hemorrhage. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(14): 102534
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i14/102534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534