Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2025; 13(14): 102534
Published online May 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534
Published online May 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, mean ± SD
Information | EG (n = 80) | CG (n = 80) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Average age (years) | 63 ± 12.5 | 62 ± 12.1 | 0.032 | 0.974 |
Sex ratio (male/female) | 47/33 | 51/29 | 0.421 | 0.516 |
GCS score | 10.7 ± 3.4 | 10.5 ± 3.1 | 0.389 | 0.698 |
Hematoma volume (mL) | 32.8 ± 25.8 | 33.5 ± 23.3 | −0.167 | 0.867 |
- Citation: Gao WW, Jiang XB, Chen P, Zhang L, Yang L, Yuan ZH, Wei Y, Li XQ, Tang XL, Wang FL, Wu H, Zhao HK. Role of disturbance coefficient in monitoring and treatment of cerebral edema in patients with cerebral hemorrhage. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(14): 102534
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i14/102534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534