Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 16, 2025; 13(11): 100966
Published online Apr 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i11.100966
Published online Apr 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i11.100966
Model/scoring system | Primary use case | Strengths | Limitations |
Convolutional neural networks | Image-based tasks (e.g., computed tomography scans and X-rays) | High accuracy in spatial feature extraction | Computationally expensive |
Recurrent neural networks | Time-series predictions (e.g., sepsis progression) | Captures temporal dependencies effectively | Potentially high computational cost |
Multilayer perceptron | Nonlinear relationship modeling (e.g., ICU mortality) | Flexible, integrates with hybrid systems | Prone to overfitting if not regularized |
Balanced random forests | Handling imbalanced datasets | Interpretable, robust to class imbalance | Requires careful tuning of hyperparameters |
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment | Assessing organ failure severity | Widely validated, clinically interpretable | Limited to scoring; no predictive modeling |
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation | Evaluating ICU patient mortality risk | Comprehensive, includes chronic health factors | Limited in real-time adaptability |
- Citation: Sridhar GR, Yarabati V, Gumpeny L. Predicting outcomes using neural networks in the intensive care unit. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(11): 100966
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i11/100966.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i11.100966