Opinion Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2024; 12(27): 6032-6044
Published online Sep 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i27.6032
Table 1 A comparison of key elements in the existing approach and the proposed model
Aspect
Existing approach
Proposed model
GuidelinesFocus on treatmentFocus should be on prevention and early detection
Risk assessmentRelies on established risk assessment tools, mainly for coronary artery disease. Only at the individual levelExpands risk assessment to include all vascular events, using a modified risk score that considers various vascular diseases. Should be expanded to identify subpopulations at risk
Treatment approachStandard treatments for vascular diseases. Response guided approach to diagnosed conditionsTailored treatment to individual patients and timing based on findings, prioritizing preventive measures
Multidisciplinary assessmentDiverse medical specialists are involved, but each concentrate on his/her respective field. Collaboration should be involved, but currently it is not systematicPromotes a multidisciplinary approach involving vascular specialists, imaging specialists, hematologists, rheumatologists, and vascular and cardiac surgeons, led by a vasculature specialist who coordinates the process
Medical specialtyCardiology focuses primarily on the heartVascular medicine becomes a broader specialty