Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2024; 12(24): 5534-5541
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534
Table 3 Comparison of growth indicators between the two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Group | Control group | Observation group | t | P value |
Growth rate (%) | ||||
Before intervention | 4.56 ± 0.61 | 4.81 ± 0.75 | 1.715 | 0.090 |
After intervention | 3.56 ± 0.59 | 2.25 ± 0.89 | 8.190 | 0.001 |
Height (cm) | ||||
Before intervention | 125.26 ± 3.00 | 125.11 ± 2.95 | 0.222 | 0.829 |
After intervention | 133.44 ± 2.33 | 127.81 ± 2.43 | 10.934 | 0.001 |
Bone age (year) | ||||
Before intervention | 8.80 ± 0.50 | 8.91 ± 0.64 | 0.941 | 0.348 |
After intervention | 9.24 ± 0.64 | 7.21 ± 0.33 | 18.836 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Wang XM, Li W, Yang LQ, Luo R, Zhang CC. Effect of dietary with Zhibai dihuang pills and gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-analogue on girls with precocious and rapidly progressive puberty. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(24): 5534-5541
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i24/5534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534