Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2024; 12(23): 5366-5373
Published online Aug 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i23.5366
Figure 1
Figure 1 Changes in blood gas indexes before and after treatment. A: There was no significant difference in the PaO2 in the observation group (42.39 ± 6.14) and in the control group (41.01 ± 5.89) (t = 1.338, P = 0.183). The PaO2 in both groups was significantly increased after treatment (P < 0.05), and it was significantly higher than the control group (68.54 ± 5.96) than in the observation group (76.92 ± 5.94), (t = 8.226, P < 0.001); B: There was no significant difference in the PaCO2 in the observation group (51.38 ± 4.57) and the control group (52.64 ± 3.89) (t = 1.725, P = 0.087). The PaCO2 in both groups was significantly decreased after treatment (P < 0.05), and in the observation group (35.58 ± 3.10) it was significantly lower than the control group (43.08 ± 3.83) (t = 12.659, P < 0.001); C: There was no significant difference in the PaO2/FiO2 of the observation group (189.19 ± 10.95) and in the control group (192.05 ± 11.55) (t = 1.487, P = 0.139). The PaO2/FiO2 was significantly increased in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05), and in the observation group (426.97 ± 41.39), it was significantly higher than the control group (387.18 ± 28.86) (t = 6.115, P < 0.001). cP < 0.001.