Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2024; 12(23): 5320-5328
Published online Aug 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i23.5320
Table 1 Comparison of ultrasound characteristics between pathological complete response group and non-pathological complete response group
Ultrasonic feature
PCR group, n = 59
Non PCR group, n = 59
χ2
P value
Edge of lesion1.3740.241
Burr41 (69.49)72 (60.50)
Smooth18 (30.51)47 (39.50)
Calcification lesion1.5320.216
    Yes27 (45.76)43 (36.13)
    No32 (54.24)76 (63.87)
Peripheral echo halo2.0530.152
High and low echo dizziness32 (54.24)51 (42.86)
No27 (45.76)68 (57.14)
Posterior echo6.7670.009
Attenuation38 (64.41)52 (43.7)
Unchanged21 (35.59)67 (56.3)
Tumor morphology1.4640.226
Quasi-circular object11 (18.64)32 (26.89)
Irregular48 (81.36)87 (73.11)
Lesion diameter6.7690.006
    ≥ 2.0 cm36 (61.02)48 (40.34)
    < 2.0 cm23 (38.98)71 (59.66)
Alder blood flow grading4.4480.035
    ≥ II stage41 (69.49)63 (52.94)
    < II stage18 (30.51)56 (47.06)