Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2024; 12(22): 5008-5015
Published online Aug 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i22.5008
Published online Aug 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i22.5008
Table 2 Comparison of myocardial micro perfusion indexes between the two groups
Item | Control group (n = 47) | t | P value | Observation group (n = 51) | t | P value | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |||||
CTFC | 80.25 ± 4.89 | 48.23 ± 4.66a | 32.05 | < 0.01 | 78.98 ± 5.47 | 37.12 ± 5.02a,c | 42.07 | < 0.01 |
TMPG | 130.14 ± 7.85 | 105.25 ± 6.11a | 19.65 | < 0.01 | 128.97 ± 10.04 | 96.12 ± 5.78a,c | 19.04 | < 0.01 |
CFVR | 2.25 ± 0.41 | 2.98 ± 0.47a | -6.52 | < 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.46 | 3.32 ± 0.51a,c | -13.53 | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Lv Y, Luo WJ. Dapagliflozin and sacubitril on myocardial microperfusion in patients with post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure and type 2 diabetes. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(22): 5008-5015
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i22/5008.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i22.5008