Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2024; 12(21): 4618-4625
Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4618
Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4618
Table 2 Comparison of video fluoroscopic swallowing examination before and after intervention between the two groups
Group | Number of samples | Oral delivery time | Swallowing reaction | Pharyngeal delivery time | Laryngeal closure time | ||||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Control group | 43 | 1.52 ± 0.53 | 0.89 ± 0.24a | 1.12 ± 0.38 | 0.80 ± 0.37a | 2.51 ± 0.45 | 1.76 ± 0.41a | 0.70 ± 0.19 | 0.54 ± 0.13a |
Observation group | 43 | 1.56 ± 0.52 | 0.61 ± 0.20a | 1.09 ± 0.42 | 0.56 ± 0.34a | 2.47 ± 0.51 | 1.50 ± 0.34a | 0.68 ± 0.21 | 0.50 ± 0.12a |
t value | 0.353 | 5.877 | 0.347 | 3.132 | 0.386 | 3.201 | 0.463 | 1.483 | |
P value | 0.725 | 0.000 | 0.729 | 0.002 | 0.701 | 0.002 | 0.644 | 0.142 |
- Citation: Xu H, Chen M, Wu YL, Lu YF, Wang X, Jiang W, Zhang YY. Application value research of swallowing treatment device combined with swallowing rehabilitation training in the treatment of swallowing disorders after stroke. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(21): 4618-4625
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i21/4618.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4618