Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4137-4145
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4137
Table 2 Comparison of cardiopulmonary exercise function and echocardiographic indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)


Rehabilitation group
Conventional group
t
P value
VO2 Max (mL/kg/min)Before the intervention17.86 ± 2.9016.99 ± 2.511.6580.100
After the intervention21.46 ± 3.18a19.99 ± 2.79a2.5400.013
AT (mL/kg/min)Before the intervention12.96 ± 2.4913.60 ± 2.34-1.3700.174
After the intervention15.20 ± 2.29a15.05 ± 2.79a0.3040.762
Maximum metabolic equivalentsBefore the intervention5.28 ± 0.965.33 ± 0.82-0.2890.773
After the intervention6.18 ± 0.93a5.73 ± 0.77a2.7240.008
LVEF (%)Before the intervention44.63 ± 4.3245.90 ± 3.32-1.7030.092
After the intervention53.65 ± 4.70a51.21 ± 4.45a2.7570.007
LVEDD (mm)Before the intervention58.80 ± 5.6857.00 ± 5.441.6740.097
After the intervention68.72 ± 6.54a65.36 ± 5.67a2.8370.005
LVESD (mm)Before the intervention48.11 ± 5.3046.58 ± 4.501.6080.111
After the intervention38.93 ± 3.82a42.49 ± 4.62a-4.3470.000