Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4065-4073
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4065
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4065
Scales | Objects | Criteria |
MBI | Physical function | The total score was 100 points, with classifications as follows: 75–95 (mild dependence), 50–70 (moderate dependence), 25–45 (severe dependence), and 0–20 points (full dependence)[9,10] |
GDS | Depression level | The total score was 30 points, indicating depressive symptoms if > 11 points were scored[11] |
HAMA | Anxiety levels | The total score was 50 points, with classifications as follows: ≥ 29 (severe anxiety), 21–28 (marked anxiety), 14–20 (moderate anxiety), and 7–13 points (mild anxiety)[12] |
MNA | Nutritional status | The total score was 30 points, with classifications as follows: > 24 (good), 17–24 (possible malnutrition), and < 17 points (malnutrition)[13] |
MoCA | Cognitive function | The total score was 30 points, wherein < 26 points indicate cognitive impairment[14] |
PSQI | Sleep quality | The total score was 21 points, with classifications as follows: 0–5 (good quality), 6–10 (general), 11–15 (poor), and 16–21 points (fairly poor)[15] |
- Citation: Bao DY, Wu LY, Cheng QY. Effect of a comprehensive geriatric assessment nursing intervention model on older patients with diabetes and hypertension. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4065-4073
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i20/4065.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4065