Study on the treatment of dysphagia after stroke with electromyographic biofeedback intensive training

Figure 3 Comparison of standardized swallowing assessment and videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale scores. All statistical data in this study were entered into excel software by the first author and the corresponding author respectively, and the statistical processing software was SPSS 25.0 for calculation, and expressed as the measurement value of the mean ± SD, which did not meet the positive. The data of the normal distribution were described by M (QR), and the Mann-Whitney test was used. The data conforming to the normal distribution was analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. It was found that there was no significant difference in the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) and videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) scores between the three groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05), after 4 wk of treatment, it was found that the SSA and VDS scores of the three groups were significantly improved compared with the previous ones, and the difference between the three groups was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). A: SSA score; B: VDS score. EMGBF: Electromyographic biofeedback; SSA: Standardized swallowing assessment; VDS: Videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale.