Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3744-3751
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3744
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3744
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative recovery time and related indicators, mean ± SD
| Group | Premium service model group (n = 60) | Traditional care service group (n = 60) | Overall situation | 95%CI | P value | |
| Postoperative recovery time (d) | 14.5 ± 2.1 | 17.8 ± 2.3 | 14.2 ± 1.9 | 13.7-14.7 | < 0.001 | |
| Pain score (0-10) | 3.2 ± 1.4 | 4.7 ± 1.9 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 2.8-3.5 | < 0.001 | |
| Hand function score (0-100) | 88.5 ± 6.2 | 78.4 ± 7.1 | 89.0 ± 5.7 | 87.8-89.2 | < 0.001 | |
- Citation: Chen L, Tu QM, Guo ZD, Zhu XW, Wang W, Xie HF, Ye Y. Effect analysis of applying high-quality service model to surgical nursing. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(19): 3744-3751
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i19/3744.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3744