Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2024; 12(18): 3491-3496
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3491
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3491
Table 2 compares anal incontinence scores (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Before surgery | 7 d after surgery | 14 d after surgery | 21 d after surgery | 28 d after surgery |
| Research group (n = 64) | 4.05 ± 0.54 | 11.24 ± 1.15 | 7.24 ± 0.54 | 5.11 ± 0.48 | 4.05 ± 0.78 |
| Control group (n = 64) | 4.03 ± 0.55 | 11.22 ± 1.12 | 9.05 ± 0.64 | 8.24 ± 0.51 | 6.28 ± 0.81 |
| t value | 0.208 | 0.100 | 17.292 | 35.753 | 15.865 |
| P value | 0.836 | 0.921 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Liu ZL, He YW, Liu YF, Wang N, Li W, Shen LZ. A comparative study of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation gymnastics on postoperative anal function of lower rectal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(18): 3491-3496
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i18/3491.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3491