Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2024; 12(17): 3035-3044
Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3035
Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3035
Table 7 Comparison of major adverse cardiac events between the two groups, n (%)
MACE event | Control group (n = 51) | Case management unit (n = 52) | χ2/t | P value |
Myocardial infarction | 1 (1.96) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Heart failure | 1 (1.96) | 1 (1.92) | ||
Malignant arrhythmia | 2 (3.92) | 1 (1.92) | ||
Cardiac readmission | 5 (9.80) | 2 (3.85) | ||
Cerebral apoplexy | 1 (1.96) | 0 (0.00) | ||
reCABG | 1 (1.96) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Cumulative MACE incidence | 11 (21.57) | 4 (7.69) | 3.985 | 0.046 |
- Citation: Li T, Lu FH, Zhao Q. Impact of specialized nursing outpatient case management on post-coronary artery bypass grafting patients. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(17): 3035-3044
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i17/3035.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3035